menu MENU
arrow_back Tilbake til alle artikler
Endre land (Nåværende : Norway) language
Kontakt vårt medlem i Norway mail_outline
Besøk nettstedet til Bull & Co account_balance

arrow_backTidligere artikkel
Artikkel 78
Neste artikkelarrow_forward

Right to an effective judicial remedy against a supervisory authority

Offisielle tekster Retningslinjer Beslutninger Vurderinger
EU-regulering Vurderinger
nasj. regulering
Vis nøkkelord og artikler relatert til art. 78 i forordningen keyboard_arrow_down Skjul nøkkelord og artikler relatert til art. 78 keyboard_arrow_up

Nøkkelord relatert til art. 78

Vis forordningens fortaletekst relatert til art. 78 keyboard_arrow_down Skjul forordningens fortaletekst relatert til art. 78 keyboard_arrow_up

(141) Every data subject should have the right to lodge a complaint with a single supervisory authority, in particular in the Member State of his or her habitual residence, and the right to an effective judicial remedy in accordance with Article 47 of the Charter if the data subject considers that his or her rights under this Regulation are infringed or where the supervisory authority does not act on a complaint, partially or wholly rejects or dismisses a complaint or does not act where such action is necessary to protect the rights of the data subject. The investigation following a complaint should be carried out, subject to judicial review, to the extent that is appropriate in the specific case. The supervisory authority should inform the data subject of the progress and the outcome of the complaint within a reasonable period. If the case requires further investigation or coordination with another supervisory authority, intermediate information should be given to the data subject. In order to facilitate the submission of complaints, each supervisory authority should take measures such as providing a complaint submission form which can also be completed electronically, without excluding other means of communication.

(147) Where specific rules on jurisdiction are contained in this Regulation, in particular as regards proceedings seeking a judicial remedy including compensation, against a controller or processor, general jurisdiction rules such as those of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (13) should not prejudice the application of such specific rules.

Vis direktivets fortaletekst relatert til art. 78 keyboard_arrow_down Skjul direktivets fortaletekst relatert til art. 78 keyboard_arrow_up

(55) Whereas, if the controller fails to respect the rights of data subjects, national legislation must provide for a judicial remedy; whereas any damage which a person may suffer as a result of unlawful processing must be compensated for by the controller, who may be exempted from liability if he proves that he is not responsible for the damage, in particular in cases where he establishes fault on the part of the data subject or in case of force majeure; whereas sanctions must be imposed on any person, whether governed by private of public law, who fails to comply with the national measures taken under this Directive;

GDPR

The Regulation goes further than the Directive: it is not at the discretion of Member States to set up a procedure for appeals, but a absolute right granted to any physical person or legal entity to appeal against a legally binding decision of the supervisory authority concerned. The right to a judicial remedy against a decision by a supervisory authority is an essential element of the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data.

This  right to a an effective judicial remedy arises where the supervisory authority does not handle a complaint or does not inform the data subject within three months or a shorter period as prescribed by the applicable national law, on the progress or outcome of the complaint lodged (paragraph 2).

As a principle, the data subject must lodge a complaint in the jurisdiction of the Member State where the supervisory authority is established (paragraph 3).

Finally, the European text obliges the supervisory authority to communicate to the relevant jurisdiction a complaint against one of its decisions, the notice or the decision of the European Data Protection Board, which would have been made previously under the consistency mechanism (paragraph 4).

Direktivet

We have seen (see the comments on Article 77) that pursuant to the Directive, the Member States should implement a procedure whereby any citizen, or an association that represents that citizen can lodge a complaint with the competent control authority, especially to check the lawfulness of a relevant processing.

The Directive further provided that decisions by the supervisory authorities which give rise to complaints may be appealed through the courts.

Norway

Muligheter for overprøving og domstol følger også av alminnelige forvaltningsrettslige prinsipper.

Utfordringer

The evolution is significant. Several States did not allow an appeal against the decisions of the supervisory authorities, often due to their lack of binding powers. The states should therefore insert this remedy in their domestic law, according to their specific procedures (administrative, judicial courts, etc.).

For instance, under Belgian law, the implementation of this new right to an effective judicial remedy will necessarily involve the implementation of a new procedure. 

We wouldn't be surprised that, as in other areas (right to competition, right to energy, etc.), the remedy is entrusted to a specialized chamber within a Member State.

arrow_back Tidligere artikkel • Artikkel 78 • Neste artikkel arrow_forward
arrow_back Tidligere artikkel • Artikkel 78 Neste artikkel arrow_forward
arrow_back Tidligere artikkel • Artikkel 78 Neste artikkel arrow_forward
Retour au sommaire
arrow_back Tidligere artikkel • Artikkel 78 Neste artikkel arrow_forward
Forordning
1e 2e

Art. 78

1.   Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each natural or legal person shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy against a legally binding decision of a supervisory authority concerning them.

2.   Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each data subject shall have the right to a an effective judicial remedy where the supervisory authority which is competent pursuant to Articles 55 and 56 does not handle a complaint or does not inform the data subject within three months on the progress or outcome of the complaint lodged pursuant to Article 77.

3.   Proceedings against a supervisory authority shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the supervisory authority is established.

4.   Where proceedings are brought against a decision of a supervisory authority which was preceded by an opinion or a decision of the Board in the consistency mechanism, the supervisory authority shall forward that opinion or decision to the court.
1. forslag close

Art. 74

1. Each natural or legal person shall have the right to a judicial remedy against decisions of a supervisory authority concerning them.

2. Each data subject shall have the right to a judicial remedy obliging the supervisory authority to act on a complaint in the absence of a decision necessary to protect their rights, or where the supervisory authority does not inform the data subject within three months on the progress or outcome of the complaint pursuant to point (b) of Article 52(1).

3. Proceedings against a supervisory authority shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the supervisory authority is established.

4. A data subject which is concerned by a decision of a supervisory authority in another Member State than where the data subject has its habitual residence, may request the supervisory authority of the Member State where it has its habitual residence to bring proceedings on its behalf against the competent supervisory authority in the other Member State.

5. The Member States shall enforce final decisions by the courts referred to in this Article.
2. forslag close

Art. 74

1. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each natural or legal person shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy against a legally binding decision of a supervisory authority concerning them.

2. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each data subject shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy where the supervisory authority competent in accordance with Article 51 and Article 51a does not deal with a complaint or does not inform the data subject within three months or any shorter period provided under Union or Member State law on the progress or outcome of the complaint lodged under Article 73.

3. (...) Proceedings against a (…) supervisory authority shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the supervisory authority is established. 3a. Where proceedings are brought against a decision of a supervisory authority which was preceded by an opinion or a decision of the European Data Protection Board in the consistency mechanism, the supervisory authority shall forward that opinion or decision to the court.

4. (…)

5. (…)
Direktiv close

Art. 28

(…)

3. (…)

Decisions by the supervisory authority which give rise to complaints may be appealed against through the courts.
Norway
compare_arrows
visibility Gamle loven

Art. 78

Rett til et effektivt rettsmiddel overfor en tilsynsmyndighet

1. Uten at det berører annen administrativ eller ikke-rettslig prøving, skal enhver fysisk eller juridisk person ha rett til et effektivt rettsmiddel overfor en rettslig bindende avgjørelse som gjelder dem, og som er truffet av en tilsynsmyndighet.

2. Uten at det berører annen administrativ eller ikke-rettslig prøving, skal enhver registrert ha rett til et effektivt rettsmiddel dersom tilsynsmyndigheten som har kompetanse i henhold til artikkel 55 og 56, ikke behandler en klage eller ikke underretter den registrerte innen tre måneder om klagebehandlingsforløpet eller utfallet av klagen som er inngitt i henhold til artikkel 77.

3. En sak mot en tilsynsmyndighet skal bringes inn for domstolene i medlemsstaten der tilsynsmyndigheten er etablert.

4. Dersom det anlegges sak mot en tilsynsmyndighets avgjørelse som ble truffet etter en uttalelse eller en avgjørelse fra Personvernrådet innenfor rammen av konsistensmekanismen, skal tilsynsmyndigheten framlegge nevnte uttalelse eller avgjørelse for domstolen.
Gamle loven close

Pol.§ 43 Personvernnemndas organisering og oppgaver

Personvernnemnda avgjør klager over Datatilsynets avgjørelser, jf. § 42 fjerde ledd. Nemnda er et uavhengig forvaltningsorgan administrativt underordnet Kongen og departementet.2 § 42 første ledd annet punktum gjelder tilsvarende.

Personvernnemnda har syv medlemmer som oppnevnes for fire år med adgang til gjenoppnevning for ytterligere fire år. Lederen og nestlederen oppnevnes av Stortinget. De øvrige fem medlemmene oppnevnes av Kongen.

Personvernnemnda kan bestemme at lederen eller nestlederen sammen med to andre nemndsmedlemmer kan behandle klager over avgjørelser som må avgjøres uten opphold.

Personvernnemnda orienterer årlig Kongen om behandling av klagesakene.

Søksmål om gyldigheten av Personvernnemndas avgjørelser rettes mot staten ved Personvernnemnda.

Kongen kan gi nærmere regler om Personvernnemndas organisering og saksbehandling.
arrow_back Tidligere artikkel • Artikkel 78 Neste artikkel arrow_forward
close

2016 - www.itiplaw.eu.