menu MENU
arrow_back Back to the list of all Articles
Change country (Currently : Germany) language
Contact our local member in Germany mail_outline
Visit the website of Rossbach & Beier account_balance

arrow_backPrevious Article
Article 79
Next Articlearrow_forward

Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor

Official
Texts Guidelines Caselaw Review of
EU Regulation Review of
Nat. Regulation
Show key term(s) and Article(s) related to article 79 of the Regulation keyboard_arrow_down Hide key term(s) and Article(s) related to article 79 keyboard_arrow_up
Show the recitals of the Regulation related to article 79 keyboard_arrow_down Hide the recitals of the Regulation related to article 79 keyboard_arrow_up

(145) For proceedings against a controller or processor, the plaintiff should have the choice to bring the action before the courts of the Member States where the controller or processor has an establishment or where the data subject resides, unless the controller is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers.

Show the recitals of the Directive related to article 79 keyboard_arrow_down Hide the recitals of the Directive related to article 79 keyboard_arrow_up

(55) Whereas, if the controller fails to respect the rights of data subjects, national legislation must provide for a judicial remedy; whereas any damage which a person may suffer as a result of unlawful processing must be compensated for by the controller, who may be exempted from liability if he proves that he is not responsible for the damage, in particular in cases where he establishes fault on the part of the data subject or in case of force majeure; whereas sanctions must be imposed on any person, whether governed by private of public law, who fails to comply with the national measures taken under this Directive;

The GDPR

Article 79 gives people affected by processing, a genuine right to an effective judicial remedy against both the controller and the processor in case of infringement of their rights resulting from the processing of their data. This right is not to be confused either with the possibility of lodging a complaint with a supervisory authority referred to in article 78, nor with any other administrative or extra-judicial remedy provided under the relevant national law.

The second paragraph allows the data subject to bring his action either before the courts of the Member State in which the controller has an establishment or in the courts of the state of habitual residence of the data subject, unless controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers.

It should be noted that as per recital 146, the jurisdictional rules contained in the Regulation need subject to the general jurisdictional rules contained in other legal instruments, such as those contained in Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council of 12 December 2012 concerning jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions on civil and commercial matters (Regulation called Brussels I bis).

The Directive

The Directive Article 22 requires the Member States to provide to any person the right to a judicial remedy in case of breach of the rights guaranteed to him by the national provisions transposing the Directive.

Potential issues

The competence of the courts will not necessarily imply that they must apply their national laws that codify the Regulation or that the national authority of the state court is competent.

arrow_back Previous Article • Article 79 • Next Article arrow_forward
arrow_back Previous Article • Article 79 Next Article arrow_forward
arrow_back Previous Article • Article 79 Next Article arrow_forward

Summary

European Union

European Union

CJEU caselaw

C‑132/21 (12 January 2023), Budapesti Elektromos Művek

Article 77(1), Article 78(1) and Article 79(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,

must be interpreted as permitting the remedies provided for in Article 77(1) and Article 78(1) of that regulation, on the one hand, and Article 79(1) thereof, on the other, to be exercised concurrently with and independently of each other. It is for the Member States, in accordance with the principle of procedural autonomy, to lay down detailed rules as regards the relationship between those remedies in order to ensure the effective protection of the rights guaranteed by that regulation and the consistent and homogeneous application of its provisions, as well as the right to an effective remedy before a court or tribunal as referred to in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Decision of the court

Opinion of the advocate General

Retour au sommaire Retour au sommaire
arrow_back Previous Article • Article 79 Next Article arrow_forward
Regulation
1e 2e

Art. 79

1.   Without prejudice to any available administrative or non-judicial remedy, including the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority pursuant to Article 77, each data subject shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy where he or she considers that his or her rights under this Regulation have been infringed as a result of the processing of his or her personal data in non-compliance with this Regulation.

2.   Proceedings against a controller or a processor shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the controller or processor has an establishment. Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers.
1st proposal close

Art. 75 

1. Without prejudice to any available administrative remedy, including the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority as referred to in Article 73, every natural person shall have the right to a judicial remedy if they consider that their rights under this Regulation have been infringed as a result of the processing of their personal data in non-compliance with this Regulation.

2. Proceedings against a controller or a processor shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the controller or processor has an establishment. Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has its habitual residence, unless the controller is a public authority acting in the exercise of its public powers.

3. Where proceedings are pending in the consistency mechanism referred to in Article 58, which concern the same measure, decision or practice, a court may suspend the proceedings brought before it, except where the urgency of the matter for the protection of the data subject's rights does not allow to wait for the outcome of the procedure in the consistency mechanism.

4. The Member States shall enforce final decisions by the courts referred to in this Article.
2nd proposal close

Art. 75 

1. Without prejudice to any available administrative or non-judicial remedy, including the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority under Article 73, data subjects shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy if they consider that their rights under this Regulation have been infringed as a result of the processing of their personal data in non-compliance with this Regulation.

2. Proceedings against a controller or a processor shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the controller or processor has an establishment (…). Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority acting in the exercise of its public powers.

3. (…)

4. (…)
Directive close

Art. 22

Without prejudice to any administrative remedy for which provision may be made, inter alia before the supervisory authority referred to in Article 28, prior to referral to the judicial authority, Member States shall provide for the right of every person to a judicial remedy for any breach of the rights guaranteed him by the national law applicable to the processing in question.
Germany
compare_arrows

Belgique close

Art. 14

§ 1er. Le président du tribunal de première instance, siégeant comme en référé, connaît de toute demande relative au droit accordé par ou en vertu de la loi, d'obtenir communication de données à caractère personnel, et de toute demande tendant à faire rectifier, supprimer ou interdire d'utiliser toute donnée à caractère personnel inexacte ou, compte tenu du but du traitement, incomplète ou non pertinente, dont l'enregistrement, la communication ou la conservation sont interdits(, au traitement de laquelle la personne concernée s'est opposée) ou encore qui a été conservée au-delà de la période autorisée.

  § 2. Le président du tribunal du domicile du requérant est compétent pour les demandes visées au § 1er. Si le requérant n'a pas de domicile en Belgique, le président du tribunal du domicile du (responsable du traitement), personne physique, est compétent. Si le (responsable du traitement) est une personne morale, le président du tribunal du siège social ou du siège administratif est compétent.

L'ordonnance est prononcée en audience publique. Elle est exécutoire par provision, nonobstant appel ou opposition.

§ 3. La demande est introduite par requête contradictoire.

  La requête contient à peine de nullité :

  1° l'indication des jour, mois et an;

  2° les nom, prénom, profession et domicile du requérant;

  3° les nom, prénom et domicile de la personne à convoquer;

  4° l'objet de la demande et l'exposé sommaire des moyens;

  5° la signature du requérant ou de son avocat.

  § 4. La requête est envoyée par lettre recommandée à la poste au greffier de la juridiction ou déposée au greffe.

  Après que, le cas échéant, les droits de mise au rôle ont été payés, les parties sont convoquées par le greffier sous pli judiciaire, à comparaître à l'audience fixée par le juge. Une copie de la requête est jointe à la convocation.

  § 5. L'action fondée sur le § 1er n'est recevable que si la demande visée à l'article 10, § 1er, ou celle visée à l'article 12, § 2, a été rejetée ou s'il n'y a pas été donné suite (dans le délai prescrit à l'article 10, § 1er, alinéa 2, ou à l'article 12, § 3, alinéa 1er, selon le cas). <L 1998-12-11/54, art. 19, 004; En vigueur : 01-09-2001>

  § 6. Si des données inexactes, incomplètes ou non pertinentes, ou dont la conservation est interdite, ont été communiquées à des tiers, ou si une communication de données a eu lieu après l'expiration de la période durant laquelle la conservation de ces données était autorisée, le président du tribunal peut ordonner au (responsable du traitement) d'informer ces tiers de la rectification ou de la suppression de ces données. <L 1998-12-11/54, art. 19, 004; En vigueur : 01-09-2001>

  § 7. Lorsqu'il existe des motifs impérieux de craindre la dissimulation ou la disparition des éléments de preuve pouvant être invoqués à l'appui d'une action prévue au § 1er, le président du tribunal de première instance, saisi par voie de requête unilatérale, signée et présentée par la partie ou son avocat, ordonne toute mesure de nature à éviter cette dissimulation ou cette disparition.

  § 8. Les dispositions des §§ 6 et 7 ne limitent en rien la compétence générale dont dispose en la matière le président du tribunal de première instance, siégeant en référé.
arrow_back Previous Article • Article 79 Next Article arrow_forward
close

2016 - www.itiplaw.eu.